| 1. |
QUALITY:
Students and/or staff agree that the innovation increases "quality" in
the course, program, office or institution. Evidence of quality may include
student ratings or letters of support from colleagues. |
| 2 |
EFFICIENCY:
There is evidence that the innovation or outstanding program contributes
to a more efficient way of doing things. Student ratings, perceptions
of outside consultants and pre/post-comparison of time involved are examples
of evidence. |
| 3. |
COST
EFFECTIVENESS: There is evidence that the innovation adds a value to the
institution while at the same time containing or reducing costs. Cost
data involved are examples of evidence. |
| 4. |
REPLICATION:
The program can be replicated in other institutions with a minimum of
difficulty. |
| 5. |
CREATIVITY:
The program should be as original as possible or the adaptation should
be at least creative. Description of the program or letters from experts
are examples of evidence. |
| 6. |
TIMELINESS:
The program should not be more than five years old in the institution,
but it must have been around long enough to have been tested so that it
meets most of the criteria. |